Post by slartibartfarst42 on Jul 6, 2014 10:35:57 GMT
Time once again for another of my reviews; this time a Bare Knuckle 'Crawler' set in a PRS SE Custom 24. As my reviews are always long, the short version is – Description on website accurate. Very good.
Now I’ll say from the outset that I was always wary of this pickup due to the numerous references to it being ‘dark’ and to be brutally honest, the fact that Tim said it would be ideal did very little to allay those fears. However, as I do believe it is foolish to completely ignore professional advice, I eventually decided to order a Crawler set, secure in the knowledge that I could always change them to something else if I didn’t like them. Let’s start with a general statement about Crawlers:
‘the pickups had to work equally well in both LP and Strat style guitars’
Mmmmmm…….. I have my doubts. I would certainly say that Crawlers will work supremely well in the vast majority of Strats but I think the ‘Les Paul’ reference will take more qualification. If by ‘Les Paul’ we’re referring to pretty much any single cut guitar then I would say, yes, they will work. Why? Simply because most single cut guitars on the market are somewhat thinner and somewhat brighter than a traditional Gibson. I’ve tried quite a few of them over the last few weeks so I feel confident in making that assertion. A Gibson Les Paul is often darker and thicker sounding and if you have a guitar like that, I suspect that you might find Crawlers a bit too much.
Bridge
‘The Crawler humbucker has a rich, fat, mid range with sweet highs that clean up beautifully and also produce bright split coil tones that retain plenty of output. Bass response is full and warm with excellent detail and the hot wind produces a smooth, natural sustain that really sings through a pushed amp.’
I wouldn’t argue with much of this. Many people, including me, describe the Holydiver as ‘thick’ but it’s positively anorexic compared to a Crawler! Pickups like a Holydiver and Miracle Man may be described as having a big bottom end but in reality, a lot of this is down to low mids, especially in the Miracle Man. While the Crawler certainly has fat mids, it also has a prominent bass response that, when combined with the fat mids, creates a really huge sound. I can’t imagine anything other than a Warpig in the Bare Knuckle range that will give you this huge sound. In this respect, the Crawler does exactly what I wanted; it makes my PRS sound a lot more like a Les Paul, however, it would be misleading to suggest that the Crawler is all about bottom end because it’s not. There are highs there to balance things out and while the low end is dominant, it also has some beautiful highs to just give things a bit of bite. The result is that the low end is very articulate and the highs are nice and thick.
‘Sweet’ is certainly a very apt word to use here and frankly, I can’t think of a better one. I found that the thick, sweet leads you can play with these pickups brought a constant smile to my face. I installed these pickups in what was nominally my ‘second’ guitar but these pickups gave it such a fantastic lead tone that my time ended up split quite evenly between both guitars and if anything, I did more with this guitar. The Crawler is just so versatile it allows you to do loads with it. As you might imagine, rhythms are very thick and it’s also true that they’re extremely rich. It’s a really 3-dimensional tone you get from these pickups and very versatile so it will deliver a wonderful Blues Rock tone but will also take you into the realms of Metal. With that really thick and relatively dark tone, it will make a very decent fist of something like Black Sabbath. One of the things that came up quite a lot in my research into this pickup before I bought it was that it ‘growled’. All of the references to ‘sweet’, ‘rich’ and ‘smooth’ made me believe that these people were exaggerating this alleged ‘growl’ – they’re not! There is a VERY distinct growl to this pickup that is difficult to describe. The tone is too smooth to really be described as ‘aggressive’ so instead I’m going to go for the word ‘sinister’. That sinister growl was a real surprise at first but once you start to get used to it, you realise it’s actually very effective and pleasing.
Cleans are full and satisfying, maintaining those rich qualities. Cleans are certainly better than the Holydiver. Split coils aren’t something I usually bother with because I’ve never been too fussed on single coil tones, especially when you’re trying to get them out of a humbucker, but splits with the Crawler are actually very good indeed, giving the guitar a distinctly Fender twang and rather brighter than it is as a humbucker. I almost didn’t bother with a push/pull pot but I’m really pleased I did because unlike most single coil tones, the split Crawler produced some really good sounds that I could easily use.
It would be remiss of me to write a review without commenting on some potentially negative aspects of the pickup. I say potentially as there’s nothing actually bad about the pickup but there are things worth noting that may come as a surprise. Firstly, Tim isn’t kidding when he describes the bridge Crawler as a ‘hot wind’. It’s not as hot as the Holydiver but it’s a lot closer than you might imagine. As a result, it’s nothing like as open sounding as some might expect as across the forum as well as the website, there are references to ‘PAF’ and ‘Vintage Hot’ which to me, suggested something far more open that I actually received. This pickup is surprisingly compressed and saturated but fortunately, responds very well to changes in the pickup height and rolling back the guitar’s volume. I can see why Tim moved the Crawler into the contemporary section because its power, compression and saturation are all suited to that category but the richness and smoothness it gives you are clearly in the vintage hot bracket as it has a distinctly PAF vibe about it. It’s a pickup that really does bridge the gap. If you want an open sounding PAF bridge humbucker, this just isn’t for you and I’d suggest you look at other options but if you like your Blues tones with a bit more fire behind them, like higher gain Gary Moore and Slash, this is perfect. It will also hit some limitations with Metal music as the low E especially (I’m tuned to Eb) can get a bit soft but realistically, if you want to play mostly Metal, there are better options in the range anyway.
Overall, I’d say that the description on the website is spot on. ‘Warm’, ‘rich’, ‘fat’, ‘sweet’ and ‘smooth’ are all words that describe a bridge Crawler perfectly.
It is extremely versatile, being able to run from Blues to 80's Metal and is ideal if you have a reasonably bright guitar and it needs more body. I used mine in a PRS SE Custom 24 so a mahogany body with a maple cap and neck. Not the brightest guitar in the world by any means but not the darkest either and my PRS absolutely slayed with a Crawler in the bridge. Perfect!
Neck
‘the Crawler neck humbucker is voiced like a vintage PAF, open and vowel-like, with a calibrated wind to balance in output.’
Just like the bridge version, this pickup is fat, sweet and smooth and it also splits very well indeed. Cleans are full and reasonably well balanced, though the bass can start to take over if you have it too close to the strings. It’s never what you’d call a bright and sparkly clean, it’s too warm and full for that but the sound does seem to resonate well and gives a very satisfying tone. The really odd thing to me is how Tim’s managed to create a pickup that is so obviously PAF in nature (much more so than the bridge) yet kept the wind hot enough to balance extremely well with the hot bridge pickup. I don’t pretend to understand the mechanics of how this is done; all I can say is that it works. The neck Crawler is indeed far more open sounding and has a very distinctly vowel-like quality to it. That mixture of open and vowel-like tones with the natural thickness and creaminess of the pickup creates a really satisfying tone.
Negatives of the neck Crawler? Like the bridge version, there’s honestly not much to criticise but equally, like the bridge version, it can start to get rather soft in the bass. This is much more noticeable on the neck model. Although it shares those articulate characteristics that seem common to all Bare Knuckle pickups, if you start to adjust it too close to the strings and add a bit too much gain, you can really hear it starting to give up on the low E. I hesitate to use the word ‘mud’ because that’s not really accurate but the bottom end can start to go soft to the degree that it starts to have a ‘mushy’ quality to it. The Emerald neck pickup from Bare Knuckle just doesn’t seem to do this but then the Crawler has some qualities that the Emerald is possibly lacking so it’s not really a criticism; more an observation. The reality is that if you want some of the qualities where the Crawler shines, there needs to be a compromise elsewhere and in this set, it’s that softness in the bass.
There was a lot I liked about the Crawler neck but it ultimately wasn't for me and I sent it back. It was caught too much in the middle ground for my tastes. It wasn't articulate enough in the low end for more modern styles and the wind was too hot and therefore warm and dark to be really effective as a PAF pickup. If you prefer more modern, you're better off with the Emerald or Cold Sweat from Bare Knuckle and if you want things more vintage, the Mule would be a better bet.
In the final analysis, this is a VERY good set of pickups. It’s a highly versatile set that will run from traditional Blues all the way to Metal, though its natural home seems to be Blues Rock. That combination of a hot and growly Alnico V bridge with an open, vowel-like PAF Alnico IV neck gives you a really impressive palette of tones. In an ideal world I’d maybe take it with a touch less bass and a shade tighter but it’s not an insurmountable issue at all and certainly shouldn’t put anyone off trying them unless you have a guitar that is somewhat warmer and darker than mine.
Now I’ll say from the outset that I was always wary of this pickup due to the numerous references to it being ‘dark’ and to be brutally honest, the fact that Tim said it would be ideal did very little to allay those fears. However, as I do believe it is foolish to completely ignore professional advice, I eventually decided to order a Crawler set, secure in the knowledge that I could always change them to something else if I didn’t like them. Let’s start with a general statement about Crawlers:
‘the pickups had to work equally well in both LP and Strat style guitars’
Mmmmmm…….. I have my doubts. I would certainly say that Crawlers will work supremely well in the vast majority of Strats but I think the ‘Les Paul’ reference will take more qualification. If by ‘Les Paul’ we’re referring to pretty much any single cut guitar then I would say, yes, they will work. Why? Simply because most single cut guitars on the market are somewhat thinner and somewhat brighter than a traditional Gibson. I’ve tried quite a few of them over the last few weeks so I feel confident in making that assertion. A Gibson Les Paul is often darker and thicker sounding and if you have a guitar like that, I suspect that you might find Crawlers a bit too much.
Bridge
‘The Crawler humbucker has a rich, fat, mid range with sweet highs that clean up beautifully and also produce bright split coil tones that retain plenty of output. Bass response is full and warm with excellent detail and the hot wind produces a smooth, natural sustain that really sings through a pushed amp.’
I wouldn’t argue with much of this. Many people, including me, describe the Holydiver as ‘thick’ but it’s positively anorexic compared to a Crawler! Pickups like a Holydiver and Miracle Man may be described as having a big bottom end but in reality, a lot of this is down to low mids, especially in the Miracle Man. While the Crawler certainly has fat mids, it also has a prominent bass response that, when combined with the fat mids, creates a really huge sound. I can’t imagine anything other than a Warpig in the Bare Knuckle range that will give you this huge sound. In this respect, the Crawler does exactly what I wanted; it makes my PRS sound a lot more like a Les Paul, however, it would be misleading to suggest that the Crawler is all about bottom end because it’s not. There are highs there to balance things out and while the low end is dominant, it also has some beautiful highs to just give things a bit of bite. The result is that the low end is very articulate and the highs are nice and thick.
‘Sweet’ is certainly a very apt word to use here and frankly, I can’t think of a better one. I found that the thick, sweet leads you can play with these pickups brought a constant smile to my face. I installed these pickups in what was nominally my ‘second’ guitar but these pickups gave it such a fantastic lead tone that my time ended up split quite evenly between both guitars and if anything, I did more with this guitar. The Crawler is just so versatile it allows you to do loads with it. As you might imagine, rhythms are very thick and it’s also true that they’re extremely rich. It’s a really 3-dimensional tone you get from these pickups and very versatile so it will deliver a wonderful Blues Rock tone but will also take you into the realms of Metal. With that really thick and relatively dark tone, it will make a very decent fist of something like Black Sabbath. One of the things that came up quite a lot in my research into this pickup before I bought it was that it ‘growled’. All of the references to ‘sweet’, ‘rich’ and ‘smooth’ made me believe that these people were exaggerating this alleged ‘growl’ – they’re not! There is a VERY distinct growl to this pickup that is difficult to describe. The tone is too smooth to really be described as ‘aggressive’ so instead I’m going to go for the word ‘sinister’. That sinister growl was a real surprise at first but once you start to get used to it, you realise it’s actually very effective and pleasing.
Cleans are full and satisfying, maintaining those rich qualities. Cleans are certainly better than the Holydiver. Split coils aren’t something I usually bother with because I’ve never been too fussed on single coil tones, especially when you’re trying to get them out of a humbucker, but splits with the Crawler are actually very good indeed, giving the guitar a distinctly Fender twang and rather brighter than it is as a humbucker. I almost didn’t bother with a push/pull pot but I’m really pleased I did because unlike most single coil tones, the split Crawler produced some really good sounds that I could easily use.
It would be remiss of me to write a review without commenting on some potentially negative aspects of the pickup. I say potentially as there’s nothing actually bad about the pickup but there are things worth noting that may come as a surprise. Firstly, Tim isn’t kidding when he describes the bridge Crawler as a ‘hot wind’. It’s not as hot as the Holydiver but it’s a lot closer than you might imagine. As a result, it’s nothing like as open sounding as some might expect as across the forum as well as the website, there are references to ‘PAF’ and ‘Vintage Hot’ which to me, suggested something far more open that I actually received. This pickup is surprisingly compressed and saturated but fortunately, responds very well to changes in the pickup height and rolling back the guitar’s volume. I can see why Tim moved the Crawler into the contemporary section because its power, compression and saturation are all suited to that category but the richness and smoothness it gives you are clearly in the vintage hot bracket as it has a distinctly PAF vibe about it. It’s a pickup that really does bridge the gap. If you want an open sounding PAF bridge humbucker, this just isn’t for you and I’d suggest you look at other options but if you like your Blues tones with a bit more fire behind them, like higher gain Gary Moore and Slash, this is perfect. It will also hit some limitations with Metal music as the low E especially (I’m tuned to Eb) can get a bit soft but realistically, if you want to play mostly Metal, there are better options in the range anyway.
Overall, I’d say that the description on the website is spot on. ‘Warm’, ‘rich’, ‘fat’, ‘sweet’ and ‘smooth’ are all words that describe a bridge Crawler perfectly.
It is extremely versatile, being able to run from Blues to 80's Metal and is ideal if you have a reasonably bright guitar and it needs more body. I used mine in a PRS SE Custom 24 so a mahogany body with a maple cap and neck. Not the brightest guitar in the world by any means but not the darkest either and my PRS absolutely slayed with a Crawler in the bridge. Perfect!
Neck
‘the Crawler neck humbucker is voiced like a vintage PAF, open and vowel-like, with a calibrated wind to balance in output.’
Just like the bridge version, this pickup is fat, sweet and smooth and it also splits very well indeed. Cleans are full and reasonably well balanced, though the bass can start to take over if you have it too close to the strings. It’s never what you’d call a bright and sparkly clean, it’s too warm and full for that but the sound does seem to resonate well and gives a very satisfying tone. The really odd thing to me is how Tim’s managed to create a pickup that is so obviously PAF in nature (much more so than the bridge) yet kept the wind hot enough to balance extremely well with the hot bridge pickup. I don’t pretend to understand the mechanics of how this is done; all I can say is that it works. The neck Crawler is indeed far more open sounding and has a very distinctly vowel-like quality to it. That mixture of open and vowel-like tones with the natural thickness and creaminess of the pickup creates a really satisfying tone.
Negatives of the neck Crawler? Like the bridge version, there’s honestly not much to criticise but equally, like the bridge version, it can start to get rather soft in the bass. This is much more noticeable on the neck model. Although it shares those articulate characteristics that seem common to all Bare Knuckle pickups, if you start to adjust it too close to the strings and add a bit too much gain, you can really hear it starting to give up on the low E. I hesitate to use the word ‘mud’ because that’s not really accurate but the bottom end can start to go soft to the degree that it starts to have a ‘mushy’ quality to it. The Emerald neck pickup from Bare Knuckle just doesn’t seem to do this but then the Crawler has some qualities that the Emerald is possibly lacking so it’s not really a criticism; more an observation. The reality is that if you want some of the qualities where the Crawler shines, there needs to be a compromise elsewhere and in this set, it’s that softness in the bass.
There was a lot I liked about the Crawler neck but it ultimately wasn't for me and I sent it back. It was caught too much in the middle ground for my tastes. It wasn't articulate enough in the low end for more modern styles and the wind was too hot and therefore warm and dark to be really effective as a PAF pickup. If you prefer more modern, you're better off with the Emerald or Cold Sweat from Bare Knuckle and if you want things more vintage, the Mule would be a better bet.
In the final analysis, this is a VERY good set of pickups. It’s a highly versatile set that will run from traditional Blues all the way to Metal, though its natural home seems to be Blues Rock. That combination of a hot and growly Alnico V bridge with an open, vowel-like PAF Alnico IV neck gives you a really impressive palette of tones. In an ideal world I’d maybe take it with a touch less bass and a shade tighter but it’s not an insurmountable issue at all and certainly shouldn’t put anyone off trying them unless you have a guitar that is somewhat warmer and darker than mine.